Documentaries, videos and podcasts
August 12, 2021
Decentralized Cloud computing blockchain platform aelf has shared the latest updates of its MainNet token swap.
August 6, 2021
Enterprises are increasingly trying to balance and manage IT assets in a variety of environments, but there are plenty of tools and technologies out there to make the job a lot easier
August 4, 2021
Two decades after businesses started deploying AI solutions, one can argue they've made little progress in achieving significant gains in efficiency relative to the hype that drove expectations.
August 3, 2021
Plans start at $20 per month for a low-end virtual computer with 64GB of storage and 2GB RAM.
July 28, 2021
Deal transition costs and the impact of wage hikes will drive the Ebit (earnings before interest and tax) margins sharply lower, analysts opined
June 28, 2021
/PRNewswire/ -- According to a new market research report "Enterprise Content Management Market with COVID-19 Impact by Business Function, Component (Solutions...
Kontrol Technologies Corp.
June 18, 2021
/PRNewswire/ - Kontrol Technologies Corp. (NEO:KNR) (OTCQB:KNRLF) (FSE:1K8) ("Kontrol" or the "Company"), a leader in smart buildings and cities through IoT,...
June 15, 2021
/PRNewswire/ -- Laserfiche - der führende SaaS-Anbieter von intelligentem Content Management und Geschäftsprozess-Automatisierung - wurde in The Forrester...
June 9, 2021
/PRNewswire/ -- The Enterprise Content Management Procurement - Sourcing and Intelligence Report, provides key information about the market. For instance, the...
June 9, 2021
/PRNewswire/ -- Construction Journal, which provides an industry leading cloud-based construction research platform for construction projects across the United...
Cisco Systems, Inc.
June 4, 2021
/PRNewswire/ -- News Summary: Cisco's Webex collaboration portfolio and cloud communications services will help support AT&T enterprise clients as they embrace...
May 28, 2021
/PRNewswire/ -- On May 21st, China Electronics Technology Standardization Institute(CESI) provided accreditation to aelf (ELF), marking the first time a public...
May 20, 2021
/PRNewswire/ -- Acclaimed independent security software testing platform, AV-Comparatives has recently released the results of its Enterprise Endpoint...
May 10, 2021
/PRNewswire/ -- 360PR+, an award-winning, creative, leading independent agency, is proud to announce its certification as a Women's Business Enterprise by the...
Saint Louis University
May 7, 2021
/PRNewswire/ -- Saint Louis University has announced that Donald and Nancy Ross have made a $1 million gift to the University in support of the Chaifetz Center...
HYPER by Sanho Corporation
May 6, 2021
/PRNewswire/ -- HYPER by Sanho Corporation, creator of the world's most crowdfunded USB-C hubs, today announce the new lineup of Works With Chromebook...
May 1, 2021
Take your vision to the next level with these android app developers!
Hahn, R. W.
April 30, 2021
One key way that many governments around the world incorporate scientific research into policy-making is through cost-benefit analysis (CBA). But despite well-established practices for rigorous estimation of the pros and cons of policies, there is room to improve, particularly in characterizing difficult-to-measure benefits and the distribution of the costs and benefits across different segments of society. In this regard, announcements by US President Biden, if brought to fruition, could have far-reaching implications for how CBA is used in government decision-making. But such promising (and familiar) rhetoric is no guarantee of real progress, and the devil, as always, is in the details. These details are where the scientific community has an important role to play to improve the use of CBA and to hold the administration accountable. Some 40 years ago, President Reagan ushered in a regulatory "revolution" by requiring CBA for major regulations. Many other countries have since followed suit. Different US presidents have emphasized different parts of CBA. Republican presidents have tended to focus on the cost of regulation, or cost-benefit balancing. Democratic presidents have tended to place increasing emphasis on benefits and distribution. A Biden memo in January revisits many of these traditional Democratic priorities, but recognizing heightened awareness in society and politics, expands benefits and equity further. The memo could be construed as asking for a roadmap on how to address equity concerns that arise. It is useful to divide this problem into three parts: getting better information on the likely winners and losers from a policy; examining how to include that information in a CBA; and specifying how the distributional impacts should enter into final regulatory decisions. Better information on the distributional aspects of regulation could be very useful but will not be free. If the administration is interested in learning more about equity, it should consider funding research. This can be broken down into two parts: research on benefits and research on costs by, say, socioeconomic grouping. On the benefit side, this could involve developing better information on "dose" and response by groups in the case of environmental regulations. Groups could be defined by income or race, for example. On the cost side, it would be desirable to know more about which groups bear the most substantial costs of regulation. This is relatively straightforward in some cases where costs are highly concentrated (e.g., in the case of plant closures) but is more challenging when trying to estimate the impact of a regulation on wages or prices across different groups. Interestingly, almost no CBAs of regulations provide quantitative assessments of the benefits and costs of a regulation by particular subgroups in the population. One reason is that it is challenging to develop such estimates. Yet, such calculations are critical for understanding the distributional impacts of a regulation. Scientists can play an important role in defining how best to develop such estimates and the likely costs and benefits of doing so. The current approach to factoring information on equity into a CBA is generally to exclude such information from the quantitative analysis altogether and only consider it in the final decision to regulate. One alternative is to introduce distributional weights in comparing benefits and costs across different socioeconomic groups. The precise formulation of these weights is likely to be highly contentious. Scientists may not have any higher authority in the determination of these weights, which is largely a question of adjudicating conflicts among competing societal values, but scientists can play an important role in calculating how different weights could affect the estimation of net benefits How then should the additional information on equity be used in the regulatory decision process? One approach would be to ask the decision-maker to try to maximize net benefits but leave latitude to consider a wide range of factors, including equity. At the same time, the basis for reaching the decision, and the role that quantitative analysis played in reaching that decision, should be stated clearly. Scientists have an important role to play in estimating how decision rules are likely to affect overall net benefits and the net benefits going to different groups. The question ahead for academics and practitioners is how best to address equity concerns if the goal is to promote a regulatory agenda that actually does more good than harm.
April 22, 2021
/PRNewswire/ -- A Shutterstock, Inc. (NYSE: SSTK), uma plataforma criativa líder global que oferece soluções completas, conteúdo de alta qualidade e...
Research and Markets
April 20, 2021
/PRNewswire/ -- The "Private Wireless Networks Market by LTE, 5G, and Edge Computing in Enterprise, Industrial, and Government Solutions 2021 - 2026" report...
Be the first contributor by making edits