Log in
Enquire now
‌

Inferring Fundamental Value and Crash Nonlinearity from Bubble Calibration

OverviewStructured DataIssuesContributors

Contents

Is a
‌
Academic paper
0

Academic Paper attributes

arXiv ID
1011.53430
arXiv Classification
‌
Quantitative finance
0
Publication URL
arxiv.org/pdf/1011.53430
Publisher
ArXiv
ArXiv
0
DOI
doi.org/10.48550/ar...11.53430
Paid/Free
Free0
Academic Discipline
Finance
Finance
0
‌
Quantitative finance
0
Submission Date
November 24, 2010
0
Author Names
Didier Sornette0
Wanfeng Yan0
Ryan Woodard0
Paper abstract

Identifying unambiguously the presence of a bubble in an asset price remains an unsolved problem in standard econometric and financial economic approaches. A large part of the problem is that the fundamental value of an asset is, in general, not directly observable and it is poorly constrained to calculate. Further, it is not possible to distinguish between an exponentially growing fundamental price and an exponentially growing bubble price. We present a series of new models based on the Johansen-Ledoit-Sornette (JLS) model, which is a flexible tool to detect bubbles and predict changes of regime in financial markets. Our new models identify the fundamental value of an asset price and crash nonlinearity from a bubble calibration. In addition to forecasting the time of the end of a bubble, the new models can also estimate the fundamental value and the crash nonlinearity. Besides, the crash nonlinearity obtained in the new models presents a new approach to possibly identify the dynamics of a crash after a bubble. We test the models using data from three historical bubbles ending in crashes from different markets. They are: the Hong Kong Hang Seng index 1997 crash, the S&P 500 index 1987 crash and the Shanghai Composite index 2009 crash. All results suggest that the new models perform very well in describing bubbles, forecasting their ending times and estimating fundamental value and the crash nonlinearity. The performance of the new models is tested under both the Gaussian and non-Gaussian residual assumption. Under the Gaussian residual assumption, nested hypotheses with the Wilks statistics are used and the p-values suggest that models with more parameters are necessary. Under non-Gaussian residual assumption, we use a bootstrap method to get type I and II errors of the hypotheses. All tests confirm that the generalized JLS models provide useful improvements over the standard JLS model.

Timeline

No Timeline data yet.

Further Resources

Title
Author
Link
Type
Date
No Further Resources data yet.

References

Find more entities like Inferring Fundamental Value and Crash Nonlinearity from Bubble Calibration

Use the Golden Query Tool to find similar entities by any field in the Knowledge Graph, including industry, location, and more.
Open Query Tool
Access by API
Golden Query Tool
Golden logo

Company

  • Home
  • Press & Media
  • Blog
  • Careers
  • WE'RE HIRING

Products

  • Knowledge Graph
  • Query Tool
  • Data Requests
  • Knowledge Storage
  • API
  • Pricing
  • Enterprise
  • ChatGPT Plugin

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Enterprise Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

Help

  • Help center
  • API Documentation
  • Contact Us
By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Service.