Log in
Enquire now
‌

Biomodulation and Rehabilitation Interventions to TarGet Pelvic Health

OverviewStructured DataIssuesContributors

Contents

clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06660212
Is a
‌
Clinical study
0

Clinical Study attributes

NCT Number
NCT066602120
Health Conditions in Trial
‌
Vulvodynia
0
‌
Dyspareunia
0
Trial Recruitment Size
2400
Trial Sponsor
‌
University of Ottawa
0
Clinical Trial Start Date
2024
0
Primary Completion Date
2027
0
Study Completion Date
2028
0
Clinical Trial Study Type
Interventional0
Interventional Trial Purpose
Treatment0
Intervention Type
Device0
Procedure0
Interventional Trial Phase
Not Applicable0
Official Name
Is Multimodal Physiotherapy And/or Photobiomodulation Therapy Effective for Pain Reduction Among Those Who Experience Provoked Vestibulodynia: a Randomized Controlled Trial0
Last Updated
October 28, 2024
0
Allocation Type
Randomized0
Intervention Model
Factorial Assignment0
Masking Type
Quadruple0
Masked Party
Outcomes Assessor0
Investigator0
Care Provider0
Participant0

Other attributes

Intervention Treatment
Photobiomodulation0
Multimodal physiotherapy0
Sham photobiomodulation0
Study summary

This trial will provide evidence for the effective management of pain and pain-related domains among those who experience provoked vestibulodynia (PVD) using photobiomodulation (PBM) and multimodal physiotherapy (mPT) in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). PVD is the most common subcategory of vulvovaginal pain experienced during sexual and non-sexual activities, affects the psychological and sexual health of an astounding one in five Canadian women, yet access to evidence-informed management approaches is limited. We will employ four intervention groups: PBM, sham PBM (control), PBM combined with mPT, and mPT with sham PBM to evaluate the effectiveness of each approach on its own and the two approaches in combination. Among those who experience PVD, we seek to answer: 1. Relative to baseline and to sham PBM, does a 12-week intervention involving PBM, mPT, or a combination of mPT and PMB reduce vulvar pain severity reported on the Vulvar Pain Assessment Questionnaire (VPAQ)? 2. Is a combined mPT and PBM intervention more effective than mPT or PMB alone when considering vulvar pain severity and/or related domains as measured through VPAQ? 3. Are positive changes in vulvar pain severity and related domains observed following a 12-week intervention involving PBM, mPT or a combination of PBM and mPT retained at 6 months and at 1 year? Secondary objectives include determining the effectiveness of PBM, mPT, and mPT combined with PBM relative to sham PBM on: Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), pain sensitivity measured using provocative tests, the other domains of the VPAQ, sexual function, as well as investigating mediating effects of psychosocial variables (central sensitization index, chronic pain acceptance), gender identity, and the presence of vaginismus on patient response to mPT, PBM and mPT combined with PBM. Lastly we will monitor patient satisfaction with the interventions, adherence to the interventions, and any adverse events.

Timeline

No Timeline data yet.

Further Resources

Title
Author
Link
Type
Date
No Further Resources data yet.

References

Find more entities like Biomodulation and Rehabilitation Interventions to TarGet Pelvic Health

Use the Golden Query Tool to find similar entities by any field in the Knowledge Graph, including industry, location, and more.
Open Query Tool
Access by API
Golden Query Tool
Golden logo

Company

  • Home
  • Press & Media
  • Blog
  • Careers
  • WE'RE HIRING

Products

  • Knowledge Graph
  • Query Tool
  • Data Requests
  • Knowledge Storage
  • API
  • Pricing
  • Enterprise
  • ChatGPT Plugin

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Enterprise Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

Help

  • Help center
  • API Documentation
  • Contact Us
By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Service.